The Santa Barbara Channel is rich in petroleum, which has been mined here for over 100 years. The Channel was home to the first offshore oil well in Summerland in 1896. The first platform, Hazel, was erected in the Channel in 1958 two miles offshore of Summerland in 100 feet of water. Platform A was erected in September 1968, and on January 28, 1969, experienced an uncontrolled blowout which lasted for eight days and which spilled 100,000 barrels of crude oil over the course of several months, impacting over forty miles of coastline. This catastrophe was the catalyst for the emergence of an active environmental movement in the Santa Barbara area, what many cite as the birth of the modern environmental movement in the United States.
Another tragic oil spill blackened our shores when the Plains All American Pipeline ruptured on May 19, 2015, spilling an estimated 143,000 gallons of heavy crude oil onto the pristine Gaviota Coast, just west of Refugio State Beach, including at least 21,000 gallons into the Santa Barbara Channel. Click here for more information.
The State of California has recognized the significant risks of offshore oil development and as such has not issued a new lease in State waters since the massive 1969 oil spill in the Santa Barbara Channel. However, the Trump administration is threatening to open our shores to new and expanded offshore oil development by initiating a new Five-Year Leasing Plan. The Draft National Outer Continental Shelf (OCS) Leasing Plan, released in early January 2018, proposes to open more than 90% of the total Outer Continental Shelf (OCS) to potential new and expanded oil drilling, including the Santa Barbara Channel. This new plan threatens the progress California has made to protect our coastal resources and to transition from dirty fossil fuels toward cleaner, renewable energy sources. Click here for more information and how you can take action.
Oil and gas production in the Channel occurs on 20 offshore oil platforms and is transported to shore via pipeline. There are also a number of onshore oil and gas production and processing facilities in our area. Water quality threats from oil and gas production include releases of oil, produced water, drilling muds, and wastewater from oil platforms, discharges of ballast water, oily bilge water and wastewater from vessels that service the platforms, and deposition of air pollutants from the platforms and support vessels. Produced water, although treated, can contain high concentrations of salts, metals, hydrocarbon and organic compounds and sulfur that can harm marine life. Drilling fluids and cuttings, which are characterized by EPA as the major sources of pollutants discharged from exploratory and development drilling operations, can smother larvae, and can reduce the growth of scallops and lobsters and impair their ability to function. In addition, the risk of major oil spills is ever-present.
Channelkeeper weighs in on proposals for new oil and gas development and production projects by reviewing and commenting on Environmental Impact Reports and other associated documents. We also review and comment on discharge permits for oil and gas facilities, and conduct routine monitoring of discharges from these facilities. Here are some examples of our success in ensuring that oil and gas development and production activities do not harm water quality and the aquatic environment.
- Oil Platforms: Channelkeeper and our allies won a lawsuit against EPA for its failure to issue sufficiently stringent Clean Water Act permits for the 20 oil platforms off the central and southern California coast. As a result, EPA updated the permit, which now requires platform operators to meet state and federal clean water standards, submit to independent third-party monitoring, and conduct analyses of alternatives to discharging their wastewater into the ocean.
- Oil Leases: Channelkeeper and our partners prevailed in a legal challenge against the federal government’s finding that extending the 36 undeveloped federal oil leases off our shores would pose no significant risk to the environment. Ultimately, our victory resulted in the extinguishment of 30 of the 36 leases.
- Paredon Initiative: Channelkeeper played a lead role in the community organizing and education efforts that led to the June 2010 defeat of Measure J, Venoco’s attempt to push an environmentally harmful oil development project onto the Carpinteria community via a ballot initiative. Prior to that we submitted extensive written comments and oral testimony on the negative environmental impacts of the proposed project on water quality and aquatic habitats.
- Oil Field Stormwater Runoff: After extensive monitoring of stormwater runoff in the Ventura River watershed, Channelkeeper caused a major oil field developer to be subject to regulations requiring pollution controls and reductions. The company reached out to Channelkeeper to discuss ways to improve their pollution prevention practices beyond what the law requires, and have already begun to implement many of these improved practices, with good results for water quality.
- Clearwater Port LNG Project: Channelkeeper and EDC stopped NorthernStar Natural Gas’ proposal to put a Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) terminal in the Santa Barbara Channel. Our in-depth analysis of the “Clearwater Port” proposal identified numerous potential impacts to marine mammals, public safety and air and water quality, leading regulatory agencies to demand extensive additional information about the project, which ultimately led to the termination of the project application.